in this field is the word "WeChat" trademark battle, whether the judges or the court of first instance, seems to have stood on the side of the Tencent, the reason is simple: because the Tencent "WeChat" higher visibility, so a broad company not for their own Tencent and WeChat have different service won the WeChat text of the trademark registration.
a text triggered by "WeChat" trademark ownership disputes, a "small company" pushed to the fore. (see titanium media articles "Tencent suck thing:" WeChat "in the end with me?") the name "chuangbo Asia Pacific Technology (Shandong) Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the" chuangbo company ") for business administration by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board by the company 38" submitted by WeChat the text of the trademark registration (hereinafter referred to as the "judges") shall not be approved for registration, the judges will be prosecuted to the Beijing intellectual property court, to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests through legal means.
chuangbo company 2 months earlier than Tencent submitted a "WeChat" word trademark application, although the company submitted the application for trademark registration, the Tencent "WeChat" is still in the womb, although there is evidence of its chuangbo company has a small range, although there are large differences in chuangbo WeChat services and Tencent WeChat, although Tencent is not directly involved with the PK.
but, in this matter of "WeChat" word trademark battle, whether the judges or the court of first instance, seems to have stood on the side of the Tencent, the reason is simple: because the Tencent "WeChat" higher visibility, so a broad company not for their own Tencent and WeChat have different service "WeChat" word trademark registration.
obviously, this small company and Tencent PK in the "WeChat" trademark, seems to have become "cannon fodder", even worse, in another series of disputes caused by the patent, or the small company and Tencent PK, the result is "defeated".
well, this small company and Tencent in the patent battle, why also defeated? PK Tencent, small business or small company is not destined to be "cannon fodder"
origin: a creative v. Tencent patent infringement against Tencent breaking power
in May 2013, a record company Tencent WeChat alleged infringement of its patent rights on the grounds, in Ji’nan City Intermediate People’s Court (hereinafter referred to as the Ji’nan intermediate people’s court) to initiate patent infringement lawsuit against Tencent.
chuangbo company believes that the Tencent "WeChat" business in the "near", "WeChat public account" and other functions, has complete coverage of the patents held by "system and method for providing location information related to the online yellow pages" (Patent No.: ZL200910084756.8) all the technical therefore, a feature, Bo company Tencent sued the Ji’nan intermediate people’s court.
however, the company hit Bo unexpectedly, in the Ji’nan intermediate people’s court has not yet heard the case before, the Tencent has to 20>